This is a selection of emails betwen John and other Geneology enthusiasts, using forums set up for self-help. Clearly, John was able to provide a wealth of information to many people, sharing with great generosity. His efforts were very much appreciated. There were many more examples of this type of work, and this is only an example.



Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 21:57:47 +1200 From: "Terry's mail" <termon@xtra.co.nz> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] John Draffin's wedding chapel I am trying to decipher a marriage entry at Barony. Would "Relief Chapel Tollcross" be correct? If so, what is a Relief Chapel? Terry Auckland, New Zealand. termon@xtra.co.nz
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:28:26 +0100 To: termon@xtra.co.nz Subject: John Draffin's wedding chapel From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> > I am trying to decipher a marriage entry at Barony. Would "Relief Chapel Tollcross" be correct? Between 1806 and 1847, yes. From 1847 - 1900 it was Tollcross Main Street United Presbyterian Church, from 1900 - 1929, it was the United Free Church, and in 1929 became Tollcross Central, Church of Scotland, since destroyed by fire. Prior to 1806 there may have been a Relief Church congregation meeting in other premises in Tollcross but that is the year when the church was built. > If so, what is a Relief Chapel? A church in membership of the Relief Church, created in 1761 "for the relief of oppressed Christian congregation" when some Church of Scotland members split over the question of patronage. Merged in 1847 with the Secession Church to form the united Presbyterian church. etc. etc. It was a "chapel" because it was not the parish church of the Established Church. hth Josh
From: "Terry's mail" <termon@xtra.co.nz> To: <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: John Draffin's wedding chapel Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 10:07:08 +1200 Hi Josh, you wrote: > > I am trying to decipher a marriage entry at Barony. Would "Relief >> Chapel Tollcross" be correct? > Between 1806 and 1847, yes. That's it: the wedding was 1833 <snip> > hth It does. Thanks very much. Terry Auckland, New Zealand. termon@xtra.co.nz
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:42:10 +0100 From: "dianne.harlow" <dianne.harlow@ntlworld.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] Braidfauld Villa, Braidfauld Street Hi, Can anyone on the list give me any information on Braidfauld Villa, Braidfauld Street. This property was listed in the 1881 Census for the Shettleston area as being occupied by the McEwan family and I believe my great-great aunt was a domestic servant for them. Her name was Helen CARMICHAEL. I would be grateful to know if the building still exists and what it's present use is. Thanks Dianne - Leicester, England.
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 07:36:33 +0100 To: dianne.harlow@ntlworld.com Subject: Braidfauld Villa, Braidfauld Street From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> > Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:42:10 +0100 > From: "dianne.harlow" <dianne.harlow@ntlworld.com> > To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: [LKS] Braidfauld Villa, Braidfauld Street > > Hi, > > Can anyone on the list give me any information on Braidfauld Villa, Braidfauld Street. .. > I would be grateful to know if the building still exists and what it's present use is. > > Thanks > > Dianne - Leicester, England. I don't know if you received an answer to this query already but I passed down Braidfauld St today on a bus and can confirm only one of the old stone buildings is still standing - a block of four flats immediately south of Braidfauld Gardens, unlikely to have been known as Braidfauld Villa. The rest of the houses were demolished and replaced with flats in the late 1960s / early 1970s. hth Josh
From: "dianne.harlow" <dianne.harlow@ntlworld.com> To: <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Braidfauld Villa, Braidfauld Street Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 17:53:29 +0100 Hi Josh, Thanks for the info - you were the only reply I got - it's nice to know it is still standing and I can perhaps get a look at it when I am next up there! Thanks once again! Dianne
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 07:32:40 +0100 To: dianne.harlow <dianne.harlow@ntlworld.com> Subject: Re: Braidfauld Villa, Braidfauld Street From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> > > - it's nice to know it is still standing > Sorry, Dianne, I must learn to circumscribe my orotundity. <G> The gist of the message was that Braidfauld Villa is gone, demolished in the 1960s. Sorry about that. Josh
From: "dianne.harlow" <dianne.harlow@ntlworld.com> To: <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Braidfauld Villa, Braidfauld Street Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 09:05:00 +0100 Hi Josh! Oh well, never mind! Hopefully now I can locate a photograph from somewhere of how it used to look! Thanks once again, Dianne
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:45:55 -0800 From: "Maureen Mackenzie" <maureenmackenzie@home.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com I am trying to find some information on my great-grandfather, William WHYTE, born 1825 and died 1916. He was the schoolmaster of Roughazie School in Shettleston from 1845 - 1889. He married first, Agnes BAIRD and secondly Mary YOUNG from Kilwinning. He had 21 children and I would be interested to know if there are any WHYTES out there who claim William as an ancestor. Maureen Mackenzie British Columbia
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 07:19:42 GMT To: maureenmackenzie@home.com Subject: RE: [LKS] William Whyte - Roughazie From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> Maureen Mackenzie wrote: > I am trying to find some information on my great-grandfather, > William WHYTE, born 1825 and died 1916. He was the schoolmaster > of Roughazie School in Shettleston from 1845 - 1889. He married > first, Agnes BAIRD and secondly Mary YOUNG from Kilwinning. > He had 21 children and I would be interested to know if there > are any WHYTES out there who claim William as an ancestor. > > Maureen Mackenzie > Current spelling, Ruchazie, part of Easterhouse. You may already know this but FWIW 1861 Census of Shettleston, Division 2 (which included the Village of Roughazie), Enumerator - William Whyte (Schoolmaster of Roughazie) 1871 Census of Shettleston, Division 4 (which did not include the Village of Roughazie), Enumerator - William Whyte 1881 Census of Shettleston, Division 4 (which did not include the Village of Roughazie), Enumerator - William Whyte 1851 & 1891 Census of Shettleston - not an enumerator. That's all I know about him. hth Josh
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 09:59:16 -0800 From: "Maureen Mackenzie" <maureenmackenzie@home.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] William Whyte - Roughazie Josh Thank you for the census information and the current spelling of Roughazie. I have a painting, done about 1920 of the old Ruchazie School House, and a small book, printed in 1920, called, "Ruchazie. A District and a School in the Provan." My g.grandfather is mentioned because he was one of the last Parochial Schoolmasters in Scotland. I hope one day to return to Scotland and visit Sandymount Cemetery where his tombstone is set to look towards Ruchazie. Thank you again. Maureen -- >
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 22:51:43 EST From: JBree87700@aol.com To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] Greenfield/Pricliemuir... In a message dated 11/13/00 3:04:04 PM, LANARK-D-request@rootsweb.com writes: << Prickliemuir >> Hi, I found Shettleston just fine, but Greenfield escapes me unless it's up in the Highlands and I don't find Prickliemuir at all! Could you tell me where these are? tx, Jim
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:10:22 +1100 From: "Ella Ross" <rosske@one.net.au> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] Greenfield/Pricliemuir... Dear Jim, Until I was eleven years old I lived at 418 Old Shettleston Road, opposite Shettleston football park. Behind the football park ran the railway line. Beyond the railway line was Greenfield, just the burn and fields, beyond that again was Lightburn. After WW11 the green fields were built on and a Corporation housing scheme was built. We called it Greenfield but in my latest Glasgow map it is shown as Springboig. Ella Ross, Sydney
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 07:30:24 GMT From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] Greenfield/Pricliemuir... Jim wrote: > Hi, I found Shettleston just fine, but Greenfield escapes me unless it's up > in the Highlands and I don't find Prickliemuir at all! Could you tell me > where these are? tx, Jim > Greenfield is still where Ella said and is named on the map I have. Springboig is further to the east. Between the two is Budhill where the Prick(l)ie(s)muir Pit was located, about 100 yards north of the present Shettleston (railway) Station. The pit closed over 100 years ago and its name is unlikely to appear on any modern map. <G> hth Josh
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 18:43:09 +1100 From: "Ella Ross" <rosske@one.net.au> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] Greenfield/Pricliemuir... Dear Josh, Shettleston is certainly still there. I visited last year. My mother was born in Budhill and her father was a miner. Of course Shettleston is still standing or precariously balancing on top of hundreds of old mines. I have some marvellous books on Shettleston with wonderful photos that I bought in 1990 at the People's Palace. Thanks for bringing up the memories. Ella Ross, now of Sydney Australia. It is so wet here today it remimded me of an awful wet day last year in Edinburgh.
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 18:24:41 -0000 From: "Duncan McIntosh" <duncan@mcintosh1943.freeserve.co.uk> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] villages of glasgow 2 Villages of Glasgow 2 Below is a list of areas, now within Glasgow, which were once independent villages. Use only as a rough guide as the facts have not been given other than very basic scrutiny. It means to serve as a guide only to help those not familiar with the area. There are many districts/ areas in Glasgow not mentioned here. Perhaps listers with better sources could give more accurate detail. North of River Clyde. Anderston-18th c. , part of Glasgow 1846 Bridgeton -18th c., part of Glasgow 1846 Calton - 18th c, part of Glasgow 1846 Camlachie pre 18th c, part of Glasgow 1846 Parkhead pre 18th c, part of Glasgow 1846 Maryhill 18th c, part of Glasgow 1891 Springburn 19th c part of Glasgow 1891 Tollcross 18th c ; part of Glasgow ? (probably by 1846) All of above were always in Lanarkshire and part of Barony Parish Partick 12th c, part of Glasgow 1912 (Once part of Govan parish, also in Lanarkshire but parts may have also been in Dunbartonshire) Shettleston pre 16th c, part of Glasgow 1912 always in Lanarkshire and in Barony Parish South of River Clyde Gorbals 13th c (aka Little Govan /Brigend ) Part of Glasgow 1846 but always had strong ties with Glasgow and was used as a leper colony. Always in Lanarkshire, once part of Govan parish and then became a parish in its own right. Govanhill 18thc part of Glasgow 1891 once in Renfrewshire Langside 16th c. part of Glasgow 1891 once in Renfrewshire Govan pre 10th c (aka Meikle Govan) part of Glasgow 1812 Parish in own right, always in Lanarkshire Cathcart 12th c, part of Glasgow 1912 once in Renfrewshire Pollockshaws 17th c, part of Glasgow 1912 once in Renfrewshire Cardonald 15th part of Glasgow 1926 once in Renfrewshire Hurlet 19th c, part of Glasgow 1926 once in Renfrewshire Nitshill 19thc. part of Glasgow 1926 once in Renfrewshire Crossmyloof pre 17th c , probably joined Glasgow by 1912 once in Renfrewshire Polmadie 12th c, probably joined Glasgow by 1846,? if ever in Renfrewshire Strathbungo 18th c. probably joined Glasgow by 1891, ? if ever in Renfrewshire
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 07:40:04 GMT From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Duncan McIntosh wrote: > Tollcross 18th c ; part of Glasgow ? (probably by 1846) Most of it in 1912 when Glasgow expanded to include the greater part of the Parish of Shettleston. However, the new city boundary (following the old boundary between Shettleston and Old Monkland parishes at that point) left most of Causewayside St and Easterhill St in Lanarkshire until 1976 though the locals consider them to be in Tollcross. Josh
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:27:07 -0000 From: "Duncan McIntosh" <duncan@mcintosh1943.freeserve.co.uk> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] villages of glasgow (update tollcross, Gorbals)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:40:47 +1100 From: "Jwerjl" <jwerjl@bigpond.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] Camlachie Tollerop Mile End William and Mary Eadie (from post-nuptial contract) were living in Camlachie in 1847 in a house "bordered on the south by the High Road from Glasgow to Tollerop". The road is also referred to as a toll road. There is also reference to a property "being part of the enclosure or park sometime ago laid out for building the village of Mile End". We also have some street names but we have to start from scratch and of course the village names have disappeared into Glasgow so would appreciate info on where Camlachie and Tollerop were and if Mile End was ever a village. Thanks. John Edmonds Moriac Vic. Australia
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 07:45:03 GMT From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] Camlachie Tollerop Mile End "Jwerjl" <jwerjl@bigpond.com> wrote > We also have some street names but we have to start from scratch and > of course the village names have disappeared into Glasgow so would > appreciate info on where Camlachie and Tollerop were and if Mile End > was ever a village. > > Thanks. John Edmonds Moriac Vic. Australia Tollerop will be Tollcross with the archaic "fs" for the "ss" at the end. Head east from Glasgow Cross along the Gallowgate and you pass through Calton and Camlachie to Parkhead Cross, then continue on Tollcross Road to Tollcross, total distance a bit over 3 miles. "The small village of Mile-end which stretched from Bridgeton Cross towards Camlachie with Broad Street as it's main artery, also became a centre for a variety of industries including potteries, carpet weaving, food processing, ironfounding, chemical works and engineering." Villages of Glasgow Vol 1, Aileen Smart, pub John Donald, Edinburgh. Oddly enough, I had never heard the name until a year or so ago I noticed a couple of mock boulders by the side of London Road with lettering "Mile End Quarter", I'd always thought of that area as just part of Bridgeton. Now the name crops up everywhere. <G> hth Josh Glasgow
From: "Jwerjl" <jwerjl@bigpond.com> To: <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> Subject: Camlachie etc! Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 11:37:38 +1100 Josh, Thanks, beaut. I've had a few responses but you win the prize if there was one! Tollcross still looks like Tollerop to my aged eyes but of course you are correct, and it was probably perfectly clear to my ancestors. And you are the only one who came up with Mile End. In the marriage contract it reads almost as though it had been a failed village proposal but that may be just me remembering what sometimes happens to housing developments. My mother lived in Clincarthill Road, Rutherglen, and in the downloaded aerial photo the house seems to be still there so that will be great to look at. She was a public health nurse in the Gorbals, a military hospital nurse during WW1, and came out in 1922 and became a Bush Nurse; quite something for a wee Scottish lassie. Please excuse the bit of waffle and thanks again. John
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 11:40:52 +1100 From: "Jwerjl" <jwerjl@bigpond.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] Camlachie Tollerop Mile End Thanks to several for the very helpful responses to my query. Tollerop was my reading of the 1800s Tollcross!!! John, Moriac Vic. Australia
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 07:23:14 GMT From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] DUNIGAN, Shettleston, 1841 onward Does anyone have an interest in two DUNIGAN/DONEGAN households dwelling in the Cotton Land, Shettleston in the mid 19th century. Probably all Roman Catholics. I have a DUNIGAN family who appear in Girvan, Ayrshire about 1810, John (a weaver, probably born in Ireland) and Ann (m.s. CAMPBELL) with children John (1809, OPR) and Sarah (c1811) - my gggrandmother. Sarah married James McGEE and they were living in Back Row, Shettleston in 1851. Then - 1855 Ann McGEE married Patrick LYNCH at Dalbeth, witnesses William DONAGHEY and Elizabeth DUNIGAN. 1860 Henry McGee married Margaret BURNS (or Binns) at Eastmuir, witnesses Thos DUNIGAN and Margaret CONNELLY. Both Elizabeth and Thomas are names in one of the Shettleston Dunigan households but their father's parents were Thomas Dunigan and Elizabeth MARLIE. The other Dunigan's have head John who vanishes before 1861 and didn't die in Shettleston after 1854 but two of his daughters' death certificates name his wife as Catherine CAIRNEY/CARNIE. I failed to find the death of Bernard DUNIGAN, son of John, who vanishes in the 1860s, and am running out of ideas to connect these families. So, If you recognise anything in the above, please get in touch. Thanks for taking the time to read this. Josh Glasgow -- Also interested in:- REYNOLDS, Eastmuir 1851-71; HOUSTON, Middlequarter 1871; CONNOLLY, Sandyhills 1851-69, Eastmuir 1871-81;
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 07:24:37 GMT From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] Info please on a Victoria - Tallcross Church On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:58:06 EST SandraDashwood@aol.com wrote - >> Please could some one give me some info the CHURCH Called VICTORIA TALLCROSS church of Scotland, >> is this church still standing i was informed it had burned down ??? Tollcross Victoria still stands. What burned recently was the old church at the back of the Kirk used as a hall this many years. Tollcross Free Church was built in Causewayside Street in 1867. In 1900, (most of) the Free Church merged with the United Presbyterian Church, who also had a presence in Tollcross (since 1806), to form the United Free Church. So the Free Church congregation became Tollcross Victoria and the UP Church congregation became Tollcross Central. In 1902, a new building was opened for Tollcross Victoria on ground between the old church and Main Street (now Tollcross Road) and the old church became the church hall. In 1927, the United Free Church merged back into the Church of Scotland. hth Josh --
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:56:32 EST From: SchafferLabs@aol.com To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] Bogleshole I have an extract stating that my relative was born Bogleshole, Tollcross. Can anyone please tell me anything about this place. Many thanks, Sheila in California
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 06:59:12 +0100 To: Lanark-L@rootsweb.com Cc: SchafferLabs@aol.com Subject: Re: [LKS] Bogleshole From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:56:32 EST Sheila wrote > I have an extract stating that my relative was born Bogleshole, Tollcross. > Can anyone please tell me anything about this place. Bogleshole appears as a country estate on the banks of the Clyde on a map of 1795, just upstream of the Clyde Iron Works. By the 1950s, most of it had disappeared under a slag tip. In the censuses for the late 19th century that I have looked at, it is never more than a handful of houses tacked on to the village of Clyde Iron Works but I'm sorry, I don't remember whether the occupiers were agricultural or iron workers or miners. About 1990, a light industrial estate was developed on the site known, perversely, as Cambuslang Investment Park. If you are looking for records in Scotland, be aware that the bulk of Tollcross is in Barony Parish (622) until 1854 then Shettleston Parish/District (622/3 until 1874 then 622/2) and became part of Glasgow in 1912 while Bogleshole is in Old Monkland (652) until 1854 then Old Monkland West (652/1) and didn't join Glasgow until 1975. Not a lot but I hope it helps. Josh --
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:21:23 EDT From: SchafferLabs@aol.com To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] Bogleshole Thank you very very much I now have a place to start looking. Thank you for taking the time to respond.S Dixon
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:33:31 +1200 From: "annkarin" <annkarin@xtra.co.nz> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] Catholic Chapels Lightburn Shettleston 1880 + occupations Hello again from New Zealand I now have a marriage cert from General Register of Scotland. However I am having difficulty reading it. Help please with:- !. The name of a Roman Catholic Chapel East???? She lived in Lightburn Shettleston and he Glebe Road. 2. A job which looks like Steam S??m Weaver 3. What was a Shoemaker Master? On the other side of the family was a Shoemaker Journeyman TIA Ann annkarin@xtra.co.nz
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 07:02:32 +0100 To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Cc: annkarin@xtra.co.nz Subject: Re: [LKS] Catholic Chapels Lightburn Shettleston 1880 + occupations From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> on Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:33:31 +1200 Ann wrote > !. The name of a Roman Catholic Chapel East???? She lived in > Lightburn Shettleston and he Glebe Road. St Paul's RC Chapel, Eastmuir (now St Paul's, Shettleston). Fr George McBrearty was the priest at that time. > 2. A job which looks like Steam S??m Weaver Steam Loom Weaver. There were a lot of them around. > 3. What was a Shoemaker Master? On the other side of the family > was a Shoemaker Journeyman Master worked on his own account, possibly employing others. Journeyman might be equally skilled but was employed by someone else. hth Josh -- Interested in COLVIN, McGEE & McHALE in Lightburn circa 1880
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 08:23:35 +1000 (EST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Toni=20Coupland?= <spirochaus@yahoo.com.au> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [LKS] District of Barony 1856 Hi All, Am looking for the birth date of a James Hamilton born in Barony abt. 1856. There doesn`t seem to be any lists for Barony for that year, so, did it have another name or was it part of another area at that time and if so, could someone please tell me in which area I should be looking. Thanking one and all, Regards, Toni
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 06:56:43 +0100 To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Cc: spirochaus@yahoo.com.au Subject: Re: [LKS] District of Barony 1856 From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 08:23:35 +1000 (EST) Toni Coupland <Spirochaus@yahoo.com.au> wrote - > Am looking for the birth date of a James Hamilton born in Barony > abt. 1856. There doesn`t seem to be any lists for Barony > for that year, so, did it have another name or was it part of > another area at that time and if so, could someone please tell > me in which area I should be looking. For civil registration purposes from 1855, Barony Parish was split in three - Maryhill (622/1), Springburn (622/2) and Shettleston (622/3). Have fun <g> hth Josh --
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 08:27:17 -0400 From: "Mark Echelberger" <mtemail@earthlink.net> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] District of Barony 1856 Josh, You sent a very helpful reply saying: > For civil registration purposes from 1855, Barony Parish was split in three - Maryhill (622/1), Springburn (622/2) and Shettleston (622/3).> In which registration area would Calton be found? Thanks, Ginny
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:59:44 +0100 From: Josh Reynolds <JoshReynolds@compuserve.com> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] District of Barony 1856 Hi Mark, on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 08:27:17 -0400 you wrote > In which registration area would Calton be found? Calton became part of Glasgow in 1846 and is 644/4 for civil registration purposes (from 1855 on). In the census of 1851 it was still under Barony in several sections starting with 622/592. A list of all the civil registration districts can be found somewhere among the free pages at Scots Origins (http://www.origins.net). hth Josh --
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:27:09 -0400 From: "Mark Echelberger" <mtemail@earthlink.net> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LKS] District of Barony 1856 Thank you Josh! Now for another related question. After looking at the Mitchell Library's virtual collection of photographs www.mitchellibrary.org, I found some of the captions for the Cumberland St pictures listed it in Hutchesontown and others identified it in Calton. Was Hutchesontown originally part of Calton--just on the other side of the Clyde? Or, were there two Cumberland Streets? One picture I am referring to is says "94-108 Cumberland Street Housing: caption also refers to 7 Greenhead St and 45-55 William St-- Area: Calton, Date c. 1902" I'm trying to get my bearings. Ginny in Virginia, USA > > In which registration area would Calton be found? > > Calton became part of Glasgow in 1846 and is 644/4 for civil registration purposes (from 1855 on). In the census of 1851 it was still under Barony in several sections starting with 622/592. > > A list of all the civil registration districts can be found somewhere among the free pages at Scots Origins (http://www.origins.net).
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:18:24 +0100 From: "duncan mcintosh" <duncan@mcintosh1943.freeserve.co.uk> To: LANARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Fw: [LKS] District of Barony 1856 Yes there were two Cumberland Streets. The original was in the Bridgeton/ Calton area in the East End and North of the River Clyde. The newer one was in the Gorbals area to the south and just opposite banks of the Clyde. When all the surrounding areas were incorporated into Glasgow many Streets were renamed. For example there were once several High Sts and Main Sts. Gorbals /Hutchesontown is not far from Bridgeton and Calton. Glasgow was very densely populated and was never big in area. A two mile radius from city centre would cover just about every area you hear of in Glasgow in the the 1850-1900 period. The old names remained but it is hard for even Glaswegians to distinguish when one area stops and another starts. Some are no more than a hundred yards long or so but they were all densely populated. Cumberland St alone in the Gorbals must had a population of 5,000 or perhaps more. Many single tenements had over 200 in them. Greenhead St is in Bridgeton/ Calton.